Racial Profiling And Discrimination By Claudia Rankine s...

Racial profiling and discrimination is an underlining theme in Claudia Rankine’s Citizen: An American Lyric. The author uses everyday encounters to expose the harsh reality African American people live. Rankine’s perspective on racism is applicable to years dating from 1860 and to present day occurrences. Discrimination against African Americans is a continuing problem. Although slavery does not exist today, African Americans continually grieve the agony their ancestors faced throughout the Civil War up to World War II. African Americans overcame slavery and oppression, but are still harassed with racial profiling tactics. Claudia Rankine experiences the racism she writes about. If she did not experience the encounters first hand, she took the stories from friends who had experienced it. The narrators thought provoking arguments and encounters informs the reader about modern day biases and discrimination. â€Å"For many African Americas, simply having dark skin seems to be grounds for being pulled over on the highway and searched for suspicion. Ted Koppel and Michael McQueen on an ABC News Special investigate how police forces call it â€Å"profiling.† Profiling was built on years of successful drug interdiction through traffic stops and searches, however angry and humiliated victims call it â€Å"racial profiling† and want it to be stopped† (â€Å"Racial Profiling and Law Enforcement: America in Black and White†). Although Citizen: An American Lyric captures acts of racial profiling cases,

What I Talk About Love By Raymond Carver - 1352 Words

In the short story, What We Talk About When We Talk About Love by Raymond Carver (1981), we find that there is no singular definitive meaning of love, because love is perceived differently by the different characters. We also see that love may have stages and throughout all its complexities, people still hold onto their present love. In this story, we see the four characters, Mel and his wife Terri, Nick whom is the narrator and his wife Laura, all struggle to define what love truly is, while seated around a table drinking Gin. We will begin the analysis of love by looking at Terri’s meaning of love and then Mel’s, Laura and Nick’s love and then finally ending with the love of the old man, in the story that Mel shares with the group. This†¦show more content†¦Mel seems to look down on Terri’s definition of love and Nick and Laura doesn’t believe in that love as well. However, Terri is the only one with direct meaning of love to her. One tha t she doesn’t question, it doesn’t perplex her, and one she will never forget. She also doesn’t need it to match up to any other levels of love. Terri said, â€Å"It was love. Sure, it’s abnormal in most people’s eyes. But he was willing to die for it. He did die for it.† Though Mel felt he is the better man between him and Ed, what he doesn’t realise is that Terri may feel that Ed loved her more than Mel did. The difference with Terri’s perception of love was that she was content with it even until the end. She made it clear that â€Å"people are different† as she stated it several times throughout the story in response to anyone that tried to take away her meaning of the love she and Ed shared. Another point, that arises in the story is that Terri leaves Ed for Mel and Mel accuses Ed to be abusive, dangerous and may even crazy. However it may seem that Terri has a type, because Mel is very rude and harsh when he speaks to her, and she allows him to talk to her how he pleases and then waits for him to â€Å"make up with her†. We see this on page 1 of the story, when Mel shares with the group that Terri is of the â€Å"kick-me-so-I’ll-know-love me school† after he tells her don’t be silly as if not valuing her views. Then, he touches her cheek with his fingers of which she

Comparison of the Two Deuteronomistic History Sources Free Essays

When we look at the scripture associated with both of these sources, it is evident that there are differences in the narration of events concerning the rise of David as king of Israel and also in his reign as king. To begin the comparison of these two different sources, the following are observations that I have made concerning stories that are present in the Tremendously History source but absent In the other(priestly) source. To begin with, In 1 Samuel beginning In chapter 17:41 through verse 51, there Is an account of David slaying Goliath when he was a youth, and still small In stature, that Is not In the Chronicles. We will write a custom essay sample on Comparison of the Two Deuteronomistic History Sources or any similar topic only for you Order Now Then, the accounts of David being Installed In King Sail’s court and the subsequent conflict between David and King Saul including Davit’s fleeing from Saul and other related events in 1 Samuel 16 through 2 Samuel 1, is not mentioned at all in the Chronicles. Also, the conflict between the house of Saul and the house of David concerning who would be king of all of Israel after Sail’s death that is in 2 Samuel 2 through 2 Samuel 5:3, is not mentioned in the Chronicles. Notably absent from the Chronicles also, is the story of Davit’s lust for Batches that resulted in an adulterous affair which precipitated his abuse of power that led to the death of Bather’s husband Uriah so that David could take Batches to be his wife. This chain of events, and the devastating results that followed for Davit’s family, as a result of this sin, Is recorded In 2 Samuel 11-20. The Chronicler states In 1 Chronicles 1 1 that David was proclaimed king over all of Israel where 2 Samuel 2:4 states that he was appointed king over all of Judas. Also notable, Is the omission of the battle In 2 Samuel 21:18-22, where David is almost killed. Another story that was very violent in tauter that was also omitted in the Chronicles was referenced in 2 Samuel 21:1-14, which is the story of how David had seven of Sail’s descendants put to death. The story concerning Abscissa’s service to an elderly King David in 1 Kings :1-4, is not present in the Chronicles either. Also, Davit’s charge to Solomon concerning avenging the death of Banner and punishing Scheme for the curse that he had placed upon David in 1 Kings 2:1-2, is not noted in the Chronicles When I looked at 1 Chronicles, there were things present in this book that are not mentioned In the Tremendously History source concerning King David. In 1 Chronicles 21 :26, fire consumes Davit’s sacrifice which Is not noted In 2 Samuel 24:25. Also, I could not find a narration In the books of Samuel or Kings that paralleled the one In 1 Chronicles 22-29, which tells of David doing much of the preparation for the building implies that there was no opposition to Solomon being appointed the next king, but 1 Kings chapters 1 and 2 tell a different story. In Samuel, the author presents the story of Davit’s family, victories over enemies, and recounts the moving of the ark of the covenant. In 1 Chronicles, King Davit’s story is told in a different order; the paving of the ark, family, victories over enemies, and then when the move of the ark is completed. Why is the story told in a different order by each source? In both of the sources, the story of King David is written to preserve the Jewish nation’s history, but in a selective way, according to the perspective of the source(author or authors). From the Deterministic History point of view, the books of 1 and 2 Samuel and the first part of the book of 1 Kings that deal with King David, were looking backward and expressing the feelings of penitence. The breaking of the covenant with WHY, at mimes by David, by willful disobedience resulted in consequences. Ultimately, 1 and 2 Kings, show how Israel, under the reign of the Advice monarchy, ending up in captivity. The answer to the question of why King Davit’s story is told is a different order by the other(priestly) source than it is by the Deterministic History source is that the other(priestly) source wanted to emphasize King Davit’s concern for the worship payoff and for his temple. This aspect of the Advice monarchy is related in order to establish a link between the house of David(monarchy) and the house of Aaron(priests). The other(priestly) source provided an account of an â€Å"unblemished† and glorious king who was victorious over all of Israel’s foes. The passages of scripture about David that do not fit this unblemished image were simply left out. This image of King David gave the Israelites hope that as he was so will their Messiah be, perfect and victorious. So, instead of looking to the past, the other(priestly) source sought to look forward in hope to Israel’s future. The process of â€Å"critical† reading has been an enlightening one for me. I used The New Oxford Annotated Bible, New Revised Standard Version, that I purchased for this class and I have found t to be an extremely valuable resource. How to cite Comparison of the Two Deuteronomistic History Sources, Papers